Supreme Court Reinstates Alabama's Struck Congressional Map for 2026 Midterms
The multi-year legal battle over Alabama's congressional boundaries reached a major turning point on June 2, 2026, as the U.S. Supreme Court issued an emergency stay allowing the state to use its disputed 2023 congressional map for the upcoming August 11, 2026 special primary election.1
The June 2 Stay Order
The Supreme Court's stay order directly superseded a May 26, 2026 ruling by a three-judge federal panel, which had blocked the state's 2023 map after concluding that it was racially discriminatory and diluted the voting strength of Black residents in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA).
By granting the stay, the conservative majority of the Supreme Court cleared the way for Governor Kay Ivey and Republican state officials to proceed with the August 11 special primary using the 2023 map drawn by the Republican-controlled legislature. Governor Ivey celebrated the decision, declaring that "Alabama knows our state, our people and our districts best."
Shifting Boundaries and Impact on Representation
The reinstatement of the 2023 map has immediate consequences for the geography of Alabama's congressional representation:
- Lowndes County Shift: Under the reinstated map, Lowndes County is shifted out of Congressional District 7 (represented by Democratic U.S. Representative Terri Sewell) and back into Congressional District 2 (represented by Democratic U.S. Representative Shomari Figures).
- Dilution of Black Representation: Democratic representatives and civil rights groups have fiercely criticized the Supreme Court's stay. U.S. Representative Sewell argued that the map denies Black voters fair representation by dismantling a second district where African Americans have the opportunity to elect candidates of their choice. U.S. Representative Figures condemned the ruling, stating that the Supreme Court's action "confirmed that there is no longer a Voting Rights Act in America, and states are essentially free to discriminate against minority voters with no consequences."2
The Supreme Court's stay allows Alabama to proceed with its scheduled special primary on August 11 under the Republican-favorable 2023 boundaries, locking in a key electoral advantage for the GOP in the 2026 midterms while the underlying legal challenges continue on the merits.
-
An instance of Procedural judicial stalling systematically locks in contested voting maps for active election cycles. — An emergency stay issued by the Supreme Court blocked a district ruling of racial discrimination to keep the contested map active for near-term voting. ↩︎
-
An instance of No race-conscious voting district can survive a challenge under the Callais precedent. — An emergency Supreme Court stay reinstated a disputed map that diluted Black voting strength, following the legal retreat from race-conscious districting. ↩︎