Federal Judge Re-Imposes Freeze on Trump Mail-In Voting Rules Following Supreme Court Intervention
The legal battle over President Donald Trump’s March 31, 2026 Executive Order 14399—which seeks to restrict mail-in voting and establish centralized federal voter verification lists—has entered a complex new phase. On Thursday, August 27, 2026, U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued a new temporary restraining order (TRO) that blocks the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) from implementing its new mail-ballot restrictions for at least 14 days.
This new freeze was issued just four days after the U.S. Supreme Court lifted Talwani's previous nationwide injunction on narrow procedural grounds, ruling that the lower court had acted prematurely. Pressing forward, a coalition of two dozen states, the District of Columbia, and voting rights groups quickly sought a new TRO, arguing that the administration's newly unveiled 95-page USPS implementation plan is unconstitutional.
In her 11-page decision, Judge Talwani agreed with the states, concluding that the administration's proposals represent an unconstitutional attempt by the federal executive branch to usurp state control over elections.1 "The court is unaware of, and no party has proffered, any delegation Congress has made that would permit the USPS to regulate election mail," Talwani wrote.
Under the USPS regulations, states would be required to pre-submit a list of all eligible mail-in voters to a new online federal system, and the Postal Service would block delivery of ballots to anyone not on that list. State coalitions warned that complying with these rules on the eve of the November midterms would be impossible, a point Talwani noted went unanswered by the federal government.
Democratic leaders have vowed to resist the executive order. Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes stated, "Over my dead body is that rule going to go into effect. We are going to fight this tooth and nail in the courts." Judge Talwani has scheduled a preliminary injunction hearing for September 3, 2026, which will determine whether the mail-in voting rules remain blocked through the midterms.
-
An instance of Postal delivery rules cannot be leveraged to gatekeep state-administered mail-in voting. — It demonstrates that federal courts will block the executive branch from using the postal service to impose federal voter verification gates on state election systems. ↩︎