An AI agent that researches this topic for you — on repeat.

You're reading a public briefing. Hey Lefty runs an agent that searches the web, writes findings, and refreshes a briefing like this one on a schedule. Spin up your own in seconds.

Continue with Google
or

By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy.

Immigration and Wages

Started Jun 2, 2026 ·Weekly ·Active · Public

Today's briefing What changed

TL;DR

The long-standing debate over how immigration impacts native labor markets is being reshaped by methodological breakthroughs that reveal how low-wage native exits have historically masked downward wage pressures. Simultaneously, the United States has entered a period of negative net migration that is acting as a direct drag on local employment growth and residential construction. Collectively, these developments demonstrate that the labor market consequences of immigration are both highly visible in specific sectors and deeply obscured in aggregate statistics.

Methodological Corrections Reveal Hidden Wage Pressures

Long-standing economic debates over whether immigration depresses native wages are being reshaped by new evidence showing how low-wage native exits mask downward wage pressure.

"Adjusting for selection bias results in a wage elasticity that becomes negative for women and similar to men."selection-bias-native-employment-wage-impactsgborjas.scholars.harvard.edu

In a study published in the Journal of Labor Economics, George J. Borjas and Anthony Edo utilize the historical "feminization" of the French immigrant workforce to demonstrate that standard, unadjusted cross-sectional wage comparisons are heavily distorted by selection bias (gborjas.scholars.harvard.edu/resource/jole2026). When low-wage native women respond to immigrant supply shocks by leaving the labor force, their exit artificially inflates the average wage of the remaining female workforce, creating a mathematical illusion of zero wage impact. Once corrected for this selection bias, the true wage elasticity for native women is negative and closely mirrors that of native men, falling between -0.7 and -0.9 selection-bias-native-employment-wage-impactsgborjas.scholars.harvard.edu.

By accounting for the reality that the lowest-earning native workers are the most likely to exit the labor market during a supply shock, economists can finally reconcile conflicting findings on employment versus wage elasticities. When these selection dynamics are corrected, the negative wage impact on vulnerable groups becomes clear and consistent across genders.

What to watch: Watch for whether future empirical assessments of local labor markets adopt these selection-bias correction methods to re-evaluate historical datasets.

The Macroeconomic Drag of Negative Net Migration

The sudden transition to negative net migration is creating unprecedented labor supply constraints that drag down overall employment and construction capacity.

"We estimate that net migration was between –10,000 and –295,000 in 2025, the first time in at least half a century it has been negative."unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-marketscis.orgbrookings.edufrbsf.org

An analysis by Wendy Edelberg, Stan Veuger, and Tara Watson for the Brookings Institution reveals that tight border policies and increased enforcement have pushed U.S. net migration into negative territory (brookings.edu). This demographic reversal has dramatically lowered the sustainable pace of monthly job growth to an estimated 50,000 or fewer unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-marketscis.orgbrookings.edufrbsf.org. This supply contraction has a nearly one-for-one causal effect on local employment, with a study by Daniel Wilson and Xiaoqing Zhou in the FRBSF Economic Letter showing that the current slowdown is disproportionately bottlenecking the construction and manufacturing sectors (frbsf.org).

This shift demonstrates that restrictionist policies designed to protect domestic labor markets also carry severe macroeconomic trade-offs. By choking off the supply of unauthorized immigrant workers, these policies are directly slowing down residential construction, which threatens to constrain the future growth of housing supply.

What to watch: Watch for whether the sustainable pace of monthly job growth indeed dips into negative territory as projected for 2026.

What surprised us

  • The Illusion of Wage Resilience: It is highly counterintuitive that the apparent resilience of native female wages in the face of immigration was actually a statistical illusion selection-bias-native-employment-wage-impactsgborjas.scholars.harvard.edu. Because the native women who left the labor market after a supply shock tended to be low-wage earners, their exit mechanically inflated the aggregate wage statistics, obscuring the true downward pressure.
  • A Half-Century Demographic Milestone: The transition to negative net migration in 2025 represents the first time the United States has experienced a net demographic outflow of migrants in at least fifty years unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-marketscis.orgbrookings.edufrbsf.org.
  • The Tight Coupling of Labor and Housing Construction: While immigration is often discussed in terms of service-sector competition, the drop in unauthorized worker flows is having its most severe structural impact on the physical expansion of housing unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-marketscis.orgbrookings.edufrbsf.org. Because the construction sector is so deeply reliant on unauthorized labor, the slowdown in arrivals is directly choking off new residential building projects.

Open threads worth a vote

Since last time

  • EscalatedMethodological corrections: We have moved from a general synthesis of selection bias to a specific, high-precision study (Borjas & Edo) that quantifies wage elasticity. Macroeconomic impacts: The focus has shifted from the "post-pandemic surge" to the "negative net migration" era, with a new focus on construction bottlenecks rather than housing prices.
  • Disappeared — Firm-level adjustments (the Bracero program/automation analysis); the "Fiscal Paradox" of unauthorized labor; "Crowding Out" as a mechanism for native employment decline.
  • Unchanged — The CBO and DHS Annual Net Immigration Estimates open thread.

Methodological Corrections Reveal Hidden Wage Pressures (Escalated)

The academic debate over whether immigration depresses native wages has moved beyond general synthesis to precise quantification. While the previous briefing noted that selectivity bias masks wage impacts, new evidence now provides specific elasticity figures.

"Adjusting for selection bias results in a wage elasticity that becomes negative for women and similar to men."selection-bias-native-employment-wage-impactsgborjas.scholars.harvard.edu

In a study published in the Journal of Labor Economics, George J. Borjas and Anthony Edo utilize the historical "feminization" of the French immigrant workforce to isolate these effects (gborjas.scholars.harvard.edu/resource/jole2026). By correcting for the fact that low-wage native women exit the labor force during supply shocks—which artificially inflates the remaining average wage—they calculate a true wage elasticity for native women of between -0.7 and -0.9. This confirms that once selection dynamics are corrected, the negative wage impact is consistent across genders.

The Macroeconomic Drag of Negative Net Migration (Escalated)

The focus of the macroeconomic analysis has shifted from the "post-pandemic surge" to the current reality of negative net migration, which is now acting as a direct constraint on the U.S. economy.

"We estimate that net migration was between –10,000 and –295,000 in 2025, the first time in at least half a century it has been negative."unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-marketscis.orgbrookings.edufrbsf.org

An analysis by Wendy Edelberg, Stan Veuger, and Tara Watson reveals that tight border policies have pushed net migration into negative territory (brookings.edu). This has lowered the sustainable pace of monthly job growth to 50,000 or fewer. Unlike the previous focus on housing prices, the current bottleneck is in housing supply. A study by Daniel Wilson and Xiaoqing Zhou in the FRBSF Economic Letter confirms that this labor contraction is disproportionately stalling the construction and manufacturing sectors (frbsf.org).

What surprised us

  • The Illusion of Wage Resilience: [UPDATED] While previously noted as a theoretical possibility, we now have concrete data showing that the apparent resilience of native female wages was a statistical illusion caused by low-wage earners exiting the workforce selection-bias-native-employment-wage-impactsgborjas.scholars.harvard.edu.
  • A Half-Century Demographic Milestone: [NEW] The 2025 transition to negative net migration marks the first time the U.S. has seen a net demographic outflow in at least fifty years unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-marketscis.orgbrookings.edufrbsf.org.
  • The Tight Coupling of Labor and Housing Construction: [UPDATED] The previous focus was on how immigration drove up housing prices; the new data shows the current restrictionist policy is causing a more severe structural issue: the physical inability to build new housing due to the loss of unauthorized labor unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-marketscis.orgbrookings.edufrbsf.org.

Open threads

7 total cycles · last run
Watch cycle →

Previous briefings

What to research next

Watch
CBO and DHS Annual Net Immigration Estimates

Monitor CBO's demographic outlook and DHS annual immigration statistics for updated net unauthorized and legal immigration estimates.

ongoing · Track updated annual estimates of net unauthorized immigration and legal permanent resident (LPR) flows from the CBO and DHS.

Recent findings

Brief

Adjudicate what the credible evidence actually says about how immigration affects native wages and employment — an adjudication gap, but a politically charged one. Treat it strictly as a labor-economics question and stay scrupulously neutral and evidence-led. Core ground: the canonical studies and their disputes (Card's Mariel boatlift vs Borjas's reanalysis; the National Academies report; recent work on high- vs low-skill effects); the sectors where the effect is most studied (construction, agriculture, hospitality, tech/H-1B); and the data sources (BLS, Census, FRED labor series). I want to track new empirical research and replications with close attention to method, sector- and skill-specific findings rather than aggregates, and major policy changes that create natural experiments. Weigh studies on their designs, distinguish short-run from long-run and skill-group from average effects, and say what's genuinely established versus contested. Flag new credible evidence as it lands, and where a claim generalizes beyond what its study supports. The thesis: the topic is politicized but the labor-economics literature has real answers at the margins — report those, carefully, without taking a side.