TL;DR
The economic debate over immigration is shifting from simple labor substitution to complex general equilibrium trade-offs. New research highlights that while restricting low-skilled immigration can boost wages for a narrow slice of native workers, it triggers cost-of-living shocks that lower real wages for the vast majority of natives. Meanwhile, fresh evidence on high-skilled immigration reveals a structural wage discount of 15% for H-1B workers, challenging the narrative that these visas are used solely to fill absolute talent shortages.
Mass enforcement exposes a sharp trade-off between targeted wage gains and systemic cost-of-living shocks
The economic consequences of mass enforcement are exposing a sharp trade-off between concentrated wage gains for specific native occupations and broad real wage declines driven by cost-of-living increases.
"We find average real wages for natives fall by 0.3% nationally and fall in every state. The declines are steepest in California, Washington, New Jersey, and Texas (−0.4 to −0.5%)." — immigration-enforcement-native-employment-impacts
This general equilibrium perspective, modeled in a study by Javier Cravino and colleagues, shows that simulating the removal of 50% of unauthorized workers nationwide raises the relative prices of immigrant-intensive sectors like farming, turning the labor supply shock into a regressive cost-of-living increase immigration-enforcement-native-employment-impacts. This systemic drag complicates the raw labor-force gains highlighted by restrictionists Steven A. Camarota and Jason Richwine, who point to a rise of 412,000 employed native-born workers as early evidence that enforcement successfully coaxes domestic labor back into the workforce immigration-enforcement-native-employment-impacts
.
What to watch: Watch whether the wage gains in highly exposed, low-margin sectors like agriculture can outpace the rising prices of basic goods as enforcement persists.
The high-skilled immigration debate is shifting toward structural wage discounts
The debate over high-skilled immigration is shifting from simple talent-scarcity arguments to the structural cost advantages that employers gain from foreign professionals.
"The H-1B program lets firms hire high-skill foreign workers for a six-year term. On average, H-1B workers earn 15 percent less than comparable natives." — high-skilled-immigration-h1b-lottery-and-firm-performance
This wage gap, identified in a new study by George J. Borjas, suggests that employer demand for H-1B visas is heavily shaped by the cost savings associated with hiring foreign workers who have limited labor market mobility high-skilled-immigration-h1b-lottery-and-firm-performance. While prior research using lottery outcomes debated whether high-skilled immigrants complement native managers or substitute for them, this persistent discount highlights a strong financial incentive to utilize the program to lower professional labor costs in competitive STEM fields high-skilled-immigration-h1b-lottery-and-firm-performance
.
What to watch: Watch for whether proposed adjustments to visa fees or program rules alter the economic viability of this wage discount for major technology employers.
A rapid demographic reversal is cooling rental markets in high-exposure states
A rapid demographic reversal is cooling rental markets while triggering localized labor market adjustments in high-exposure metropolitan areas.
"In 2024 alone, net migration reached a record 2.8 million—more than double the highest annual net migration figure recorded in U.S. history... By January 2025, the total immigrant population (both legal and unauthorized) reached 53.3 million, constituting a record 15.8% of the U.S. population." — unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-markets
The sudden transition from this historic post-pandemic influx to the enforcement-led contraction of 2025 and 2026 is acting as a dual shock, easing rental inflation in major gateway cities while forcing low-margin businesses to adapt to a smaller labor pool unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-markets. The economic consequences are highly localized, with states like California and Texas bearing the brunt of both the initial housing strain and the subsequent labor supply contraction unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-markets
.
What to watch: Watch for how quickly rental demand softens in high-exposure metropolitan areas relative to the national average.
What surprised us
- The general equilibrium paradox of mass deportations: While restrictionist policies are designed to help domestic workers, general equilibrium modeling reveals that removing unauthorized workers actually lowers average real wages for natives nationwide due to regressive cost-of-living shocks immigration-enforcement-native-employment-impacts
.
- The scale of Census underreporting: The U.S. Census Bureau initially underreported net migration for 2022 and 2023 by half, later revising the combined figure upward from 2 million to 4 million unauthorized-immigration-local-labor-and-housing-markets
.
- The structural H-1B discount: Despite the common assumption that high-skilled visas are reserved for irreplaceable, premium talent, H-1B visa holders earn an average of 15% less than comparable native workers high-skilled-immigration-h1b-lottery-and-firm-performance
.