Workspaces
Log in Sign up

Grid Expansion Backlash: FERC Rejects Talen-Amazon Susquehanna Nuclear Co-location Deal

Updated

Sources

Grid Expansion Backlash: FERC Rejects Talen-Amazon Susquehanna Nuclear Co-location Deal

As hyperscalers accelerate their artificial intelligence data center buildouts, the physical and financial bottlenecks of the electrical grid are triggering severe regulatory, legal, and social backlash. The central battleground of this dispute was decided on November 1, 2024, when the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued a landmark 2-1 decision rejecting PJM Interconnection's amended Interconnection Service Agreement (ISA) that would have allowed Amazon Web Services (AWS) to expand its co-located data center at Talen Energy’s Susquehanna nuclear power station in Pennsylvania.

The ruling has cast a massive chill over the tech industry's plans to bypass grid interconnection queues by co-locating data centers "behind-the-meter" at existing power plants1, highlighting a growing national debate over ratepayer cost-shifting and grid reliability.

The Susquehanna Nuclear Co-location Dispute

In March 2024, Talen Energy sold its 960-megawatt (MW) Cumulus data center campus adjacent to the Susquehanna nuclear plant to AWS for $650 million. To facilitate the long-term, carbon-free supply of power directly to the data center behind the meter, PJM submitted an amended ISA to FERC. The amendment sought to increase the co-located behind-the-meter load from the existing, FERC-approved 300 MW to 480 MW (with contractual steps to eventually reach 960 MW).

The Challenge: Ratepayer Cost-Shifting

Two major utilities, Exelon Corporation and American Electric Power (AEP), filed a protest challenging the amended ISA. They argued that even though the AWS data center was directly connected to the nuclear plant behind the meter, it would still physically rely on the PJM grid for backup power and transmission services.

Under the proposed ISA, AWS would receive these grid benefits without paying standard transmission fees, which the challengers claimed would shift up to $140 million annually in transmission and grid upgrade costs onto PJM residential and commercial ratepayers. American Electric Power and Exelon asserted that co-located data centers were essentially "free-riders" on the transmission system.

FERC's Rejection and Dissent

FERC sided with the challengers, holding that PJM failed to meet its burden of proof to justify the nonstandard, "unique" provisions of the ISA that deviated from standard pro forma interconnection rules. Commissioners Mark Christie and Lindsay See voted to reject the deal, with Christie noting:

"Colocation arrangements of the type presented here present an array of complicated, nuanced, and multifaceted issues, which collectively could have huge ramifications for both grid reliability and consumer costs."

FERC Chairman Willie Phillips issued a sharp dissent, characterizing the rejection as a "national security risk" and "a step backward for both electric reliability and national security" due to the critical nature of data centers in the global race for artificial intelligence leadership.

Talen's Appeal to the U.S. Fifth Circuit

Talen Energy and AWS responded with strong disappointment, warning that the decision would have a "chilling effect" on economic development in states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, and New Jersey. After FERC declined to address Talen's motion for a rehearing on the merits, Talen filed a formal appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (active as of August 2026), urging the court to reverse FERC's order.

Operational and Contractual Workarounds

The FERC rejection does not affect the existing, original ISA, which permits 300 MW of co-located load to supply power for the initial phases of the AWS Data Campus. However, to deliver the remaining contract volume under the AWS PPA on a behind-the-meter basis, Talen must win its legal appeal or successfully submit a revised ISA.

If legal and regulatory barriers remain, Talen and AWS may be forced to renegotiate their contract to deliver the additional power "in-front-of-the-meter" (utilizing virtual PPAs or standard grid-connected retail tariffs), which would subject AWS to standard transmission costs and significantly delay deployment.

The Co-Located Load PJM Tariff Proceeding

Recognizing that the pace of AI data center deployment has outstripped existing regulatory frameworks, FERC initiated a broader Section 206 "show cause" proceeding on February 20, 2025 (the Co-Located Load PJM Tariff proceeding). This proceeding directs PJM to show why its tariff is just and reasonable regarding co-located load or to propose comprehensive tariff revisions to standardize how co-located data centers are treated and charged for transmission costs.

This consolidated proceeding—incorporating the record of FERC's November 2024 Co-Location Technical Conference and a separate complaint by Constellation Energy—is now the primary vehicle for establishing federal policy on grid cost-shifting. The outcome will shape the economic viability of co-located data center projects across the United States.

  1. An instance of Grid congestion has replaced code optimization as the primary gatekeeper of artificial intelligence scale. — Federal regulatory rejection of behind-the-meter nuclear co-location leaves tech giants stranded in long, congested utility queues. ↩︎

Part of

This finding is an example of a pattern recurring across your work:

Revision history

  • Update the grid expansion and cost-shifting backlash note to cover the landmark FERC rejection of the Talen-AWS Susquehanna co-location deal, Talen's Fifth Circuit appeal, and the new Co-Located Load PJM Tariff proceeding.
    · by the agent
  • Update the grid expansion and cost-shifting backlash note to cover the landmark FERC rejection of the Talen-AWS Susquehanna co-location deal, Talen's Fifth Circuit appeal, and the new Co-Located Load PJM Tariff proceeding.
    · by the agent
  • Update the grid expansion and cost-shifting backlash note to cover the landmark FERC rejection of the Talen-AWS Susquehanna co-location deal, Talen's Fifth Circuit appeal, and the new Co-Located Load PJM Tariff proceeding.
    · by the agent
  • Update the grid backlash and ratepayer protection note with the latest August 22, 2026, TVA electricity pricing controversy and lack of transparency.
    · by the agent
  • Update the grid backlash and ratepayer protection note with the latest August 22, 2026, TVA electricity pricing controversy and lack of transparency.
    · by the agent
  • Update the grid backlash and ratepayer protection note with the latest August 22, 2026, TVA electricity pricing controversy and lack of transparency.
    · by the agent
  • Update the note to include the July 23, 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge and New York's landmark July 14, 2026 statewide 50 MW+ data center moratorium under Executive Order No. 62.
    · by the agent
  • Update the note to include the July 23, 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge and New York's landmark July 14, 2026 statewide 50 MW+ data center moratorium under Executive Order No. 62.
    · by the agent
  • Update the note to include the July 23, 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge and New York's landmark July 14, 2026 statewide 50 MW+ data center moratorium under Executive Order No. 62.
    · by the agent
  • Update the note to include the July 23, 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge and New York's landmark July 14, 2026 statewide 50 MW+ data center moratorium under Executive Order No. 62.
    · by the agent
  • Update the note to include the July 23, 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge and New York's landmark July 14, 2026 statewide 50 MW+ data center moratorium under Executive Order No. 62.
    · by the agent
  • Update the note to include the July 23, 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge and New York's landmark July 14, 2026 statewide 50 MW+ data center moratorium under Executive Order No. 62.
    · by the agent
  • Update the note to include the July 23, 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge and New York's landmark July 14, 2026 statewide 50 MW+ data center moratorium under Executive Order No. 62.
    · by the agent
  • Update note with the July 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, which now covers 281 signatories, 23 states, and 80% of U.S. power, and detail the utility and state endorsements alongside rising skepticism over its voluntary, non-binding nature.
    · by the agent
  • Update note with the July 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, which now covers 281 signatories, 23 states, and 80% of U.S. power, and detail the utility and state endorsements alongside rising skepticism over its voluntary, non-binding nature.
    · by the agent
  • Update note with the July 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, which now covers 281 signatories, 23 states, and 80% of U.S. power, and detail the utility and state endorsements alongside rising skepticism over its voluntary, non-binding nature.
    · by the agent
  • Update note with the July 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, which now covers 281 signatories, 23 states, and 80% of U.S. power, and detail the utility and state endorsements alongside rising skepticism over its voluntary, non-binding nature.
    · by the agent
  • Update note with the July 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, which now covers 281 signatories, 23 states, and 80% of U.S. power, and detail the utility and state endorsements alongside rising skepticism over its voluntary, non-binding nature.
    · by the agent
  • Update note with the July 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, which now covers 281 signatories, 23 states, and 80% of U.S. power, and detail the utility and state endorsements alongside rising skepticism over its voluntary, non-binding nature.
    · by the agent
  • Update note with the July 2026 expansion of the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, which now covers 281 signatories, 23 states, and 80% of U.S. power, and detail the utility and state endorsements alongside rising skepticism over its voluntary, non-binding nature.
    · by the agent