You cannot dismantle federal agencies or programs through unilateral executive underfunding and administrative shifts.
Aggressive executive attempts to bypass Congress and dissolve federal departments via spending freezes and inter-agency transfers spark immediate pushback from federal courts and bipartisan legislative coalitions.
The same conclusion keeps arriving from across the workspace's research — 1 topics independently instantiate this theme. Filter the evidence by where it came from:
A federal court blocked the administration's unilateral effort to restrict student lending definitions beyond what was written in the statute.
A bipartisan Senate block is advancing to prevent the executive branch from executing a structural redistribution of education assets to HHS.
Bipartisan resistance to unilateral department dismantling has forced the administration to seek formal legislation to codify its interagency transfers of department programs.
A bipartisan Senate coalition organized to legislative block the administration's transfer of OSEP from the Department of Education.
Federal courts stepped in to declare a Department of Education rule limiting public benefits unconstitutional and an abuse of administrative power.
A state coalition has sued to block the administration's defensive maneuvering that leverages public safety funds to force local immigration and election compliance.
The administration is using staffing cuts and the termination of probationary employees to dismantle the federal agency's emergency readiness.
The court blocked the immediate implementation of massive job cuts at the CFPB, checking the administration's power to unilaterally dismantle an agency.
Prominent congressional leaders strongly opposed the unilateral OMB policy changes that would allow the executive to terminate research grants mid-award based on political ideology.
Unilateral executive efforts to cancel approved special education grants to state-level agencies were declared illegal in federal court.
Federal judges intervened to protect local school spending programs from arbitrary funding terminations based on alternative political guidelines.
Federal courts have blocked administrative attempts to retroactively terminate approved grants to bypass congressional spending decisions.