← Atlas Theme · spans 1 topics

Aggregate wage averages systematically mask the concentrated impact of labor supply shocks on specific subgroups.

Broad labor market statistics conceal localized and group-level wage depression because the negative effects of labor inflows are highly concentrated among close substitutes and low-skilled cohorts.

1
Topics it spans
4
Findings citing it
Evidence window
The convergence

The same conclusion keeps arriving from across the workspace's research — 1 topics independently instantiate this theme. Filter the evidence by where it came from:

Immigration and Wages
Labor Economics Consensus: Skill-Group Effects and the NASEM Report

This consensus finding shows that a near-zero average wage impact hides the severe, concentrated wage pressures experienced by highly substitutable segments.

Immigration and Wages
The Mariel Boatlift Debate: Card's No-Effect Finding vs. Borjas's Reanalysis

It illustrates how analyzing broad skill groups can cover up real and historic downward wage pressures faced by specific, narrower education segments.

Immigration and Wages
CEPII Meta-Analysis (2025): The Comprehensive Wage Effects of Immigration

It highlights how broad aggregate averages disguise significant wage depressions that are highly concentrated within narrow skill-cell cohorts.

Immigration and Wages
Selection Bias in Native Responses: Reconciling the Employment and Wage Impacts of Immigration

It demonstrates how aggregate average wage statistics can hide severe wage depression when lower-paid native subgroups selectively exit the workforce.