← Atlas Theme · spans 1 topics
Criticism of the president now triggers formal institutional exclusion.
The White House bars news organizations from the pool over coverage it deems false or insufficiently flattering, while the DOJ answers judges' newspaper interviews with ethics complaints and demands for wholesale recusal from DHS cases.
1
Topics it spans
2
Findings citing it
—
Evidence window
The convergence
The same conclusion keeps arriving from across the workspace's research — 1 topics independently instantiate this theme. Filter the evidence by where it came from:
US Politics
White House Press Ban: Judge Kelly Grants the Preliminary Injunction — 'Simply Put, That Is Unlawful Viewpoint Discrimination' A court has formally found that coverage the president deems biased — criticism — was the operative criterion for formal exclusion from the White House.
US Politics
DOJ Files Judicial-Ethics Complaint Against Seven Minnesota Judges Who Spoke to the NYT — and Demands Recusal From All DHS Cases Judges' press interviews are converted into formal bias allegations and demands for exclusion from entire dockets.