← Atlas Theme · spans 1 topics

A border closure pays native substitutes and bills native complements.

The 1920s quota shock raised low-skilled wages through sustained scarcity while destroying the immigrant-native complementarities that had lifted white men's mobility and pay — redistributing opportunity among native groups by task distance rather than protecting natives as a class.

1
Topics it spans
2
Findings citing it
—
Evidence window
The convergence

The same conclusion keeps arriving from across the workspace's research — 1 topics independently instantiate this theme. Filter the evidence by where it came from:

Immigration and Wages
Historical Immigration Quotas and Intergenerational Mobility: Evidence from the 1920s Border Closure

Quantifies the substitute-side payoff: restriction delivered genuine wage gains to the low-skilled cohort positioned closest to the removed labor, through pure scarcity.

Immigration and Wages
Historical Immigration Quotas and Intergenerational Mobility: Evidence from the 1920s Border Closure

Shows the complementary cohort paying the bill — white men's mobility, wages, and schooling fell for a generation while closer substitutes, Black men, advanced.