The fight has moved from the rulings to the courts' right to judge.
From demanding that an entire district bench recuse from all DHS cases to resisting review of the secret memo the Pentagon treats as its effective law, the administration is contesting judicial jurisdiction over executive action itself.
The same conclusion keeps arriving from across the workspace's research — 1 topics independently instantiate this theme. Filter the evidence by where it came from:
The administration is resisting judicial review of the very secret memo it treats as its governing law.
The en banc fight is over the courts' power to police defiance at all, not any single underlying ruling.
Firing prosecutors appointed by district judges moves the conflict from rulings against the executive to the judiciary's own institutional powers.
Demanding that an entire district bench recuse from all DHS cases contests the courts' right to judge executive action itself.